(1) what predicts outcomes of harassment cases; and (2) whether courts have changed their standards for what constitutes “severe or pervasive” harassment over time. We have collected a random sample of about 200 cases that we have coded for protected category, race/gender of parties, outcome (did plaintiff survive summary judgement), were discrimination and/or retaliation claims also asserted, employer characteristics (public, private, unionized), pro se plaintiff, and judge characteristics. We will compare whether the average independent rating of severe and pervasiveness changes over time, whether these ratings are consistent with judicial determinations of severity/pervasiveness, and how these ratings correlate with surviving summary judgment.